Marsh predation experiments across Louisiana and North Carolina, 2015-05-12 to 2019-07-12
Funded By:
Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative
Funding Cycle:
RFP-VI
Research Group:
Coastal Waters Consortium III (CWC III)
Fredrick (Joel) Fodrie
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill / Institute of Marine Sciences
jfodrie@unc.edu
Marsh, Predation, Predator-Prey Interactions, Snail, Killifish, Tethering, Estuary, Fundulus grandis, Littoraria irrorata, squidpops
Abstract:
Predation tethering experiments using Gulf killifish (Fundulus grandis), marsh periwinkles (Littoraria irrorata) and standardized dried squid (“squidpops”) were conducted in marshes across Louisiana and North Carolina between 2015 and 2019. Data includes habitat characteristics of the marshes, predation rates on various prey types at different distances into the marsh, manipulative experiments on marsh vegetation structure and the influence on predation rates. Data were collected in person by various checks on the prey items through time.
Suggested Citation:
Fodrie, Fredrick (Joel), Ziegler, Shelby. 2019. Marsh predation experiments across Louisiana and North Carolina, 2015-05-12 to 2019-07-12. Distributed by: GRIIDC, Harte Research Institute, Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi. doi:10.7266/n7-k3ey-ez49
Purpose:
To understand predation rates in salt marsh habitats across Louisiana and North Carolina. This comparative work considers the influence of tidal inundation and habitat characteristics of marshes to better understand geographic variation of species interactions.
Data Parameters and Units:
In all worksheets, NA=not available Worksheet: SiteInfo State: State where experiment was conducted (LA=Louisiana, NC=North Carolina), Site: User defined identifier indicating location where assays were conducted, Habitat: Descriptor of the habitat where the assay was conducted, Latitude: Latitude of the site in decimal degrees, Longitude: Longitude of the site in decimal degrees. Worksheet: Snail predation data State: State where experiment was conducted (LA=Louisiana, NC=North Carolina), Site: User defined identifier indicating location where assays were conducted (NR=North River Bridge, HP=Hoop Pole Creek, WM=Wilmington, HV=Hatteras Village, PS5=Port Sulphur site 5, PS7=Port Sulphur site 7, WPH2=West Pointe ala Hache site 2), Habitat: Descriptor of the habitat where the assay was conducted, Transect: Replicate transect at which the tether was placed ("A", "B" or "C"), Location: Location in marsh that tether was placed (subtidal=5m seaward from marsh edge, edge=0-1m, 5m=5m landward from the marsh edge, 10m=10m landward from the marsh edge), tether.id: Unique number designated for each tether for a given day of deployment to identify experimental units (snails) in the field. Number indicates survey flag along transect (randomly placed), prey.type: Prey type that was tethered and observed for predation (Snail=Littoraria irrorata), present.absent.24hr: Status of prey item after 24 hours (1=present or not eaten, 0=absent or eaten), date.deployed: Date tethers were deployed in the field (YYYY-MM-DD), time.Deployed: Approximate time tethers were deployed in the field (24 hour format), date.collected: Date tethers were collected from the field (YYYY-MM-DD), time.collected: Approximate time tethers were collected from the field (24 hour format), deployed.by: Last name of person(s) who deployed the sample in the field, data.recorded.by: Last name of person(s) who recorded data in the field, data.entered.by: Last name of person(s) who entered the data. Note: this may not be the same individual who recorded the data in the field, Notes: Any important information regarding the tether. Worksheet: Fundulus predation data State: State where experiment was conducted (LA=Louisiana). NOTE: No Fundulus tethering occurred in North Carolina (NC), Site: User defined identifier indicating location where assays were conducted, Date: Date tethers were deployed in the field (YYYY-MM-DD), Tether.id: Unique number designated for each tether for a given day of deployment to identify experimental units (Fundulus) in the field. Number indicates survey flag along transect (randomly placed), Total Length: Total length of Fundulus grandis (mm), Sex: Sex of tethered Fundulus grandis, Deployment Location: Habitat or area that tether was deployed: (L=lab holding tank, R=rubble, E=marsh edge, T=rivulet, S=marsh surface, C=creek), Deployment Time: Approximate time tethers were deployed in the field (24 hour format), First Check (Time): Time the tethers were 1st checked (24 hour format), First Check (Status): The status of the tethered Fundulus grandis at time of check (stressed, dead, alive, unknown), Check 2 (Time): Time the tethers were checked for 2nd time (24 hour format), Check 2 (Status): The status of the tethered Fundulus grandis at time of check (stressed, dead, alive, unknown), Check 3 (Time): Time the tethers were checked for a 3rd time (24 hour format), Check 3 (Status): The status of the tethered Fundulus grandis at time of check (stressed, dead, alive, unknown), Check 4 (Time): Time the tethers were checked for a 4th time (24 hour format), Check 4 (Status): The status of the tethered Fundulus grandis at time of check (stressed, dead, alive, unknown), Check 5 (Time): Time the tethers were checked for a 5th and final time (24 hour format), Check 5 (Status): The status of the tethered Fundulus grandis at time of check (stressed, dead, alive, unknown), Notes: Any notes of relevance including possible cause of death. Worksheet: Habitat characteristics State: State where experiment was conducted (LA=Louisiana, NC=North Carolina), Site: User defined identifier indicating location where assays were conducted (NR=North River Bridge, HP=Hoop Pole Creek, WM=Wilmington, HV=Hatteras Village, PS5=Port Sulphur site 5, WPH2=West Pointe ala Hache site 2), Transect: The replicate transect at which the tether was placed ("A", "B" or "C"), Location: Location in marsh that tether was placed (subtidal=5m seaward from marsh edge, edge=0-1m, 5m=5m landward from the marsh edge, 10m=10m landward from the marsh edge), replicate: User defined replicate number, shoot density: the number of marsh grass shoots with in 0.25m2 quadrat (#/0.25m2), max shoot height (cm): length of the tallest shoot within the 0.25m2 quadrat in cm, notes: Any notes of relevance Worksheet: Shoot density experiment State: State where experiment was conducted (NC=North Carolina). NOTE: No shoot density experiments occurred in Louisiana (LA), Site: User defined identifier indicating location where assays were conducted (HP – Hoop Pole Creek) Season: Season of deployment (Summer, Fall), Transect: The replicate transect at which the tether was placed ("A", "B" or "C"), Location: Location in marsh that tether was placed (subtidal=5m seaward from marsh edge, edge=0-1m, 5m=5m landward from the marsh edge, 10m=10m landward from the marsh edge), Plot: Plot number along transect, Complexity: Randomized assigned shoot density treatment (I - increased density (increased shoots by 50%), A-ambient density, R-reduced density (reduced shoots by 50%), i.density: Initial shoot density, density: Final shoot density after manipulation, prey.type: Prey type that was tethered and observed for predation (Squidpop=standardized dried squid), date.deployed: Date tethers were deployed in the field (YYYY-MM-DD), time.deployed: Approximate time tethers were deployed in the field (24 hour format), 0.5hr: 30 minute check (0=prey was eaten, 1=prey still present), 1hr: 1 hour check (0=prey was eaten, 1=prey still present), 1.5hr: 1.5 hour check (0=prey was eaten, 1=prey still present), 2hr: 2 hour (final check) (0=prey was eaten, 1=prey still present), final: The finalized presence or absences (1 or 0), time.collected: Approximate time tethers were collected from the field (24 hour format). Worksheet: Shoot height experiment State: State where experiment was conducted (NC=North Carolina). NOTE: No shoot density experiments occurred in Louisiana (LA), Site: User defined identifier indicating location where assays were conducted (HP – Hoop Pole Creek), date.deployed: Date tethers were deployed in the field (YYYY-MM-DD), salinity: Salinity in water adjacent to marsh site on day of deployment, plot: Plot number along transect, treatment: Assigned treatment to a given plot for manipulation (10-tallest shoots 10cm, 25-tallest shoots, 50-tallest shoots 50cm, 75-tallest shoots 75cm, A - ambient shoot height (3 tallest shoot heights in notes), tether.id - Unique number designated for each tether for a given day of deployment to identify experimental units (Snails) in the field. Number indicates survey flag along transect (randomly placed), snail.size.mm: Size of given snail in mm, time.deployed: Approximate time tethers were deployed in the field (24 hour format), 24hr: 24 hour check of presence (1) or absence (0=eaten), date.collected: Date tethers were collected from the field (YYYY-MM-DD), time.collected: Approximate time tethers were collected from the field (24 hour format), Shoot density: the number of marsh grass shoots with in 0.25m2 quadrat. (#/0.25m2), Notes: Any notes of interest. For Ambient plots the 3 tallest shoot heights in cm (x/x/x).
Methods:
Snail predation data: Snails were tethered in marsh habitats at 3 sites in Louisiana and 4 sites in North Carolina. At each site, snails were placed along transects at 4 different locations across the marsh: edge (0m), 5m (5m landward from marsh edge) 10m (10m landward from the marsh edge) and subtidal (5m seaward from marsh edge). Each transect was replicated 3 times (A, B, C). Snails were left for 24 hours and presence/absence (predation) was assessed. Fundulus predation data: Fundulus grandis (gulf killifish) were tethered and placed in various deployment locations near LUMCON (Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium). Five locations were in the field (R=rubble, E=marsh edge, T=rivulet, S=marsh surface, C=creek) and one was in the lab setting as a control measure (L-lab holding tank). Each killifish was checked at random time intervals (checks) to assess predation and mortality. Habitat Characteristics: Marsh habitat characteristics such as shoot density (number of shoots in 0.25m2 quadrat) and maximum shoot height (cm) were collected from 3 replicate quadrats at sites in Louisiana and North Carolina. Data was collected at 3 locations (edge, 5m and 10m) in the marsh along 3 replicated transects (A,B,C). Shoot density experiment: To tease apart the effects of region, variation in tidal inundation and habitat variables, a manipulative field experiment was deployed at one site in North Carolina. Plots were placed at 3 locations in the marsh (edge, 5m and 10m) in the marsh and along 3 replicated transects (A,B,C). The number of shoots within a given plot was randomly assigned a complexity treatment: reduced=50% of the shoots were removed from a plot, ambient=no change to the plot, increased=shoot number was increased by 50% using wooden dowels as a marsh grass mimic. Squidpops (a standardized dried squid; Duffy et al., 2015) were placed into each plot for up to 2 hours to assess consumption rates (presence/absence). Shoot height experiment: To tease apart the effects of region, variation in tidal inundation and habitat variables, a manipulative field experiment was deployed at one site in North Carolina. Thirty plots were placed along 1 transect located 2m landward from the marsh edge. Each plot was randomly assigned 1 of 5 shoot height treatments (n=6). The treatment assigned indicated the tallest shoots within the plot (10 - shoots were no more 10cm tall, 25 – shoots were no more than 25cm tall, 50 – shoots were no more than 50 cm tall, 75 -shoots were no more than 75 cm tall, and A – shoots were left at the ambient shoot height). Snails were tethered and placed into each plot, left for 24 hours and predation was assessed (presence/absence).
Provenance and Historical References:
Duffy, J. E., Ziegler, S. L., Campbell, J. E., Bippus, P. M., & Lefcheck, J. S. (2015). Squidpops: A Simple Tool to Crowdsource a Global Map of Marine Predation Intensity. PLOS ONE, 10(11), e0142994. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142994.